Many organizations rely on legacy ETL tools like Actian DataConnect to handle data processing. Over time, these tools become expensive and harder to maintain.
Our client wanted to move away from Actian due to high licensing costs and limited flexibility. The goal was to rebuild all data workflows using a modern, open-source stack.
We migrated all Actian ETL scripts to Python-based pipelines, creating a faster, scalable, and cost-free data processing system.
The client needed a system that could:
The migration process had several difficulties:
We built a structured migration approach using Python-based tools:
We replaced Actian with:
| Steps | Process Details | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| Script Analysis | We first studied all Actian scripts in detail. We identified:
| Result: Clear understanding of all existing data workflows. |
| Logic Mapping to Python | Each Actian function was converted into Python equivalents. Examples:
| Result: All legacy logic successfully mapped to Python. |
| ETL Pipeline Rebuild | We rebuilt complete workflows using Python. Used:
| Result: Modern and structured ETL pipelines replaced old scripts. |
| Data Validation | We ran both systems in parallel:
| Result: 100% data accuracy maintained during migration. |
| Deployment & Optimization | Final Python system was deployed after validation. Improvements included:
| Result: Fully working modern data system. |
Before vs After
| Aspect | Before Solution | After Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | High licensing fees | No licensing cost |
| Performance | Slower processing | Faster execution |
| Maintenance | Difficult | Easy & structured |
| Flexibility | Limited | High flexibility |
| Dependency | Vendor locked-in | Fully independent |
Core processing
Data transformation
Data handling
Workflow automation
Data cleaning